So recently i began to do some user testing, and i recieved about 10 completed surveys + general feedback from other users who just quickly used it. I decided that i would compile these results and try to accommodates as many of these responses either through changing the program or a personal response from me. This program was tested through a variety of ages, from about 15-50, so as to gain a better understanding of how fluent and how easy the program is to use.
VIEWS ON INSTALLATION GUIDE
Some responses from the testers:
- easy to use and simple
- the video helped me to install the program
- I preferred the video over the document
- Simple yet detailed instructions that were easy to understand
- What you said in the audio didn’t exactly match what was written. It was still good
My response to these results:
I tried my best to make these instructions simple and easy to use by the basic principles of a guide i.e only one operation a step and beginning with a verb. Overall, I think that the users generally found it usable and with the provided help of the recording of me installing it, I think it definitely allowed them to properly install it without making any incorrect/ambiguous statements and decisions.
VIEWS ON OVERALL GRAPHICS
Some responses from the testers:
- Clear and meaningful
- It was ok, nothing wrong
- Very basic graphics
- You could have made it more user friendly by implementing more graphics
- Looked very boring
- ‘NO’ was a good idea
My response to these results:
At the very beginning of the project I had stated that I was horrible at graphics and I would do my best to make the graphics somewhat bearable as well as put enough to make the program useable. Knowing this, I also understand that I have not included too many graphics, but through this I have made it very simple, and I think that keeping it simple allows for a better flow in the use of the program. When I was considering implementing the Fisher Price advertisements into the program, it didn’t fit in and it didn’t feel necessary to implement these images without making the program more complex, even if the user need not interact with them apart from the random spots of the image. Overall, I completely understand the users viewpoints on my graphics.
VIEWS ON GUI/LAYOUT
Some responses from the testers:
- easy to navigate and GUI was easy to follow
- the layout allowed for easy navigation through the program
- everything was easy to identify
- I had no problems knowing what each button did even without images
- Very easy to use since there was quite a bit of consistency within each screen
My Response to these results:
A generally middle to high range response. This is probably the core part of my whole assignment and am somewhat disappointed that the response wasn’t better, regardless of the fact that none gave me a mark below 6. What this means is that a number of users would prefer a better GUI, or would like me to change it a little bit to suit their needs. On one hand, I cant adapt the program to suit everyones desires, however I will look in to changing up the GUI of the program and may have another brief survey to see if there are any changes in opinions.
VIEWS ON HELP SCREEN
Some responses from the testers:
- help screen solved some minor issues of using the program
- showed all details needed to navigate through the program
- no problems occurred, but the brief look over the program seemed to be comprehensive
My response to these results:
The general response was that there weren’t any errors found. There were however instances where they didn’t understand what to do to create the program and in this case, the help screens helped them. I am still unsure of whether or not I can improve on my help screens, or is aesthetics i.e how it looks and if its visually appealing. At the moment, it is just text with arrows to the screen, but I may look into developing a timer to display all help over a certain period of time. This may improve the overall views on my help screen.
VIEWS ON TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE
Some responses from the testers:
- error with date, but guide solved issue
- I forgot to copy and paste the database and folders, and the guide solved this issue
- I completely missed the installation guide and so I didn’t properly install the program. The guide helped
My response to these results:
The overall response to my trouble shooting guide wasn’t really informed because of the fact that there were generally no errors on the part of the program. However, the only main error that I have found with the program, and one that can be resolved through the troubleshooting guide is the help for copying the database and folders. The most alarming comments from this section was that a few users completely missed the step to copy and paste the required files into C drive. At the time, I only gave a readme.txt file and this may have stopped the user from reading through it, so I have taken a recording of myself installing the program while orally explaining the steps. In some respects, I am happy with the results, however it also means that if there are any more errors in the program I have no idea about them.
PREFERENCE OF PROGRAMS
Some responses from the testers:
- a simple program for a simple purpose
- program has the basic features needed
- very basic concept, unlike outlook which has more features
- very easy to use and would prefer it over other programs because it isn’t too full of components like Outlook which is too confusing.
My response to these results:
Its not surprising that many of the users would rather other programs of mine, and I suppose that’s because it is very simple and basic, but it is also free unlike the other ones that require you to purchase it or through other illegal means. Some of the better feedback from this was that they would at some points use this over other programs simply because it is much simpler and more basic. I never intended for the program to be complex, but rather just a simple program that has the ability to create new events as well as create new records. Keeping this in mind, I never expected for the majority of the users to use my program over others, however I am happy to know that my program does solve the problems provided in a more simplistic fashion.